Has it been pointed out that if bitvm could do drivechain (peg, miner "vote", escrow) much less efficiently, it would:

Change miner incentives (according to them,debunked since 2016)

Centralize miners through the same mechanism (according to them)

And become more successful than Vanilla bitcoin ?

Invite regulatory risk for those choosing to run bitVM enabled functions (lol, bootlickers)

If so, if this is possible on BitVM, why the freakout for the addition of one isolated op-code ?

The future may see ignored core devs and maxis suddebly all for L1 expansion, because they are prostitutes.