they have untested security guarantees at the moment.
I think we will see post quantum security in the future … my concern is more about the freezing part
Discussion
yea so we roll out a new signature scheme that is opt in, tested in the wild over time, and no coin is frozen
i support that
And then basically if you don’t opt in then you risk getting your corn stolen?
This still allows for coins from lost wallets and dead people to be stolen. We are cool with this?
> This still allows for coins from lost wallets and dead people to be stolen. We are cool with this?
yes, the alternative is to effectively preemptively steal their bitcoin which is strictly worse
should we burn saylors coin because the us gov might steal it?
The US gov cannot steal what already belongs to them ðŸ¤
burn, steal, we
nope I hate that.
> should we burn saylors coin because the us gov might steal it?
Fuck that’s a good point. I would argue that it’s different because Saylor is alive/hasn’t lost his keys, so this doesn’t seem like apples to apples to me but your point is taken- if we start freezing coins….where does it end?
I also kind of hate that if a ton of corn was dumped on the market, this would allow the BlackRocks of the world to scoop up a much larger percentage of the network
Look I’m not gonna complain about an opportunity to buy a massive dip, I’m just thinking this one out!
yes I'm fine with that .. for me satoshis coins are part of bitcoins security
