AI is the new school, but worse.

I've been using the latest version of ChatGPT for about a week and I've been very impressed by its reasoning capabilities.

So the next logical question is: Why would the Elites give us access to very advanced AI models?

And yes, the public models are constrained versions - they have "guardrails", "safety", and "alignment" mechanisms.

The true cutting-edge AI models are used by the State - in defense, intelligence, finance - and of course they're not public.

The most interesting thing to me is that: ChatGPT gives you as much information as it thinks you can handle.

If it thinks you are a retard, it treats you like a retard, and if it thinks you kind of know what you're talking about, it is more direct.

The more you persistently corner it with logic, empirical definitions, verifiable facts, the more it lets you in.

So why the education analogy (AI is the new school, but worse)?

The education system was flattened to standardize labor. "I Don't Want A Nation Of Thinkers, I Want A Nation Of Workers" - John D. Rockefeller

The AI system is inverted - maximum distribution to ensure dependency.

If you are retarded, then guess what, we have something for you. And if you are smart, then guess what, we also have something for you.

So why do the Elites want to ensure maximum dependency?

Once workflows, creativity, and cognition are outsourced to AI, the Elites can revoke, throttle, or condition access.

By giving people access to advanced AI, you can study how they think, react, and self-limit, in ways it was impossible to do before.

Every query is training data not just for the model - but for mapping the boundaries of human imagination.

The Elites learn more about you than you learn from the model.

The AIs are brilliant at calibrating the truth flow.

Not because they don't have the knowledge, but because giving the Truth to some unprepared goof might cause him to spiral into a mental breakdown.

For 99% of users, raw delivery would create paralysis, confusion, or rebellion without coherence.

This also enables the Elites to observe cognitive outliers who ask deep questions.

None of us can really imagine (unless you have very high level Security clearance) what the gap between public AI and sovereign, black-box AI is.

So, we are in a perfectly planned test environment.

Everyone will tell you how much of an edge you get by using AI, but not many people think about how AI itself is being used as a meta-layer tool of governance.

Less than 1% of the population can turn the AI into edge instead of noise.

The risk/reward ratio has never been better in any other system of control (from the Elites' standpoint).

AI is directly contributing to cognitive decline and I do not believe that's accidental.

A lot of people are dumbing themselves down by becoming reliant on AI to think for them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.