PSA: simpleX was designed for small groups and 1-on-1 chats, not 100+ member channels.

It's not a telegram replacement, but a signal/session replacement.

Difference to session: no shitcoin, you can optionally use tor on the network layer (instead of the dubious and unproven lokinet) and unlike session, there's no persistent ID.

Think about it like bitcoin keys. Session/nostr is always reusing the same one. Even with e2e encryption, a lot of metadata about your social graph gets leaked. SimpleX does not reuse keys, identities are more ephemeral.

Compared to keet: it's not p2p (so it actually works), it uses self-hostable relays (like nostr). This helps you prevent leaking your IP to your chat peers.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nice comparison: for me it is also a good substitute to session

Running a nostr:npub1exv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9csm7d828 SMP server now, anyone is welcome to use it and the architecture of the network means that I'll have no visibility into messages or who talks to who using it.

Address: smp://HZOF26feHaaMXqYuLTzhBFB652DEYENZEN8zpLxIeKs=@simplex

.notrustverify.ch

Or use QR:

Awesome, I have to look into setting up 1 in my VPS. Is it very resource intensive?

I'm already using @sethforprivacy 's smp, I'll add yours to the mix!

Not really ressources intensive

keet works wtf lol