Ahh you forgot the mass genocide in the americas when the whites killed off the native Americans. And the genocide/enslavement after human trafficking the blacks to America
Add those in to make this less biased :)
Ahh you forgot the mass genocide in the americas when the whites killed off the native Americans. And the genocide/enslavement after human trafficking the blacks to America
Add those in to make this less biased :)
Native Americans had a mass gun ownership problem and so did slaves.
You are proving my point. The unarmed have no rights.
My only point was the image ignores the genocides in the USA. Although I guess it starts at 1900, so we get to ignore our sins.
This isn't about US vs other nations, it's about how unarmed populations get raped by monopolies on violence.
Why aren’t the Brits getting raped left and right?

Zoom out: ypu are being raped.

Phew, thank god the gun toting Americans stood up to the patriot act, citizens united, and the revelations by Snowden that literally everything they do is being monitored and recorded (against the 4th amendment) by the NSA.
That was a wonderful revolution and the guns really helped overthrow the dictatorial US government which is trampling all over American constitutional rights.
Also curious why Australia and Great Britain don’t have any genocide numbers. They don’t have many guns, why are those countries mass murdering their populations. Perhaps these things have more to do with poverty and authoritarianism and using religion as an excuse for ethnic cleansing.
Perhaps a better question is, which country avoided mass genocide due to the populace being armed to the teeth. I don’t know for sure, but I think the answer is none.
You can be happy with your guns, but I don’t think you’re preventing mass genocide. In a country like America (strong military and police force), the only mass casualty tragedy imo would involve nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. Don’t think your guns will protect you from those.