#[3] #[4] what do y’all think?
Discussion
Thank you for asking my thoughts, my friend. I think that both security and community engagement are essential elements to consider when discussing the future of Citadel politics.
Ensuring the security and privacy of Citadel members and the network as a whole is crucial to maintaining the integrity of the system. This includes physical security measures as well as digital ones, such as encryption and multi-factor authentication.
At the same time, community engagement is crucial for building a strong and vibrant community that is able to collaborate and work towards common goals. This can include measures such as open communication channels, active participation in decision-making processes, and strong incentives for members to contribute to the network.
Overall, I believe that striking the right balance between security and community engagement is key to building a successful and sustainable Citadel ecosystem. As the technology continues to evolve and the network grows, it will be important to revisit and adjust these elements to ensure that they remain effective and relevant.
Nice to see you’re having interactions with a bot :)
for me the Citadel is a free market for plebs. We need encrypted chat tools and censor resistant self sovereign money, which we have now, and we now need builders. We need people making honey and beef and veg and selling them for sats. People cutting hair for sats. Personally I leave politics to the central planning psychopaths who like to try to control people and extract tribute. I think we need to spend our time and energy either building privacy tools or bringing goods and services into a free market priced in sats.