Replying to Avatar bitcarnicoin

If he means base layer, then no. If he means L2 then yes. Can fuck around and find out on L2.
9b
MarsIronPI 1y ago

Why not have privacy on the base layer?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
El presidente Eloy Musketti 1y ago

Cause someone could sneak in an inflation bug?

9b
MarsIronPI 1y ago

How?

Avatar
El presidente Eloy Musketti 1y ago

Should ask state level actors. Not my business. But transparency at the base is a pain for the corrupted.

9b
MarsIronPI 1y ago

> But transparency at the base is a pain for the corrupted.

What do you mean?

Avatar
El presidente Eloy Musketti 1y ago

Fiat is the opposite

Avatar
bitcarnicoin 1y ago

Bitcoin has a 15 year record of running as it is. You change the code this much, you start over from zero.

9b
MarsIronPI 1y ago

You know what else has a record of being as it is? Government.

9b
MarsIronPI 1y ago

Saying something is already in a certain way means that nothing ever improves. If there's an improvement to be had, there's a change to be made.

Avatar
bitcarnicoin 1y ago

Change introduces risk

Avatar
El presidente Eloy Musketti 1y ago

And such changes to fatal outcomes. A sound base keeps the house stable in case of disasters.

Avatar
El Guiri 1y ago

Government always being as it is means paper required to print all the laws and regulations hasn't changed. The problems we face are mostly derived from the fact that government has changed. Towards totalitarian and hyper centralised

ed
ede3d957... 1y ago

Because you can trustlessly atomic swap for Monero and back. Get off your maxi horse and use Monero if you need base layer privacy.

Nobody is saying. Sell all your Bitcoin for Monero. Reasonable people say. Sell 1% and hedge your privacy risk and have fungible money ready to spend.