Collectivist yutzes that:

A. Have no connection to the current conflict other than

B. Being paid to show up to a protest or

C. Are pro-funding either side (or both) of the conflict via printing more money and/or more theft (taxation)

Are all people I do certainly consider enemies.

Not wanting people to be genocided? Cool. Understanding a retaliation for horrific acts? Cool.

None of this is a good situation. I consider the shemag thing to be equivalent to the traitors waving blue and yellow flags in the *<"(>;- HOR. 🤷‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

So, none of what you list here changes anything. You are saying those who support Palestinan liberation are the enemy. You dont know why any specific person is doing it. You just lump everyone together, just as a collectivist would do. If you cant understand why people are willing to fight and die to free themselves from an oppressive regime that murders women and children at will, you are now and always will be a slave. So, like I said, I must be your enemy then.

I'm calling the turds in our government in the US that want to pump more MIC money into the region enemies.

I'm also aware of enough history to know that most of those in the area currently in the spotlight are not a cohesive "people", so any kind of lumping them together into a group is ignorant. Should they ask be slaughtered? No. Obviously. So, I want us to stop funding and enabling the slaughter, since I consider that to be treasonous and also pretty gross.

Ok fair enough. I apparently misunderstood. This I must agree with

It's easy to do with anything the complicated. I'm also callous about a lot of the whole thing in Gaza, too, so that's probably a factor in how I'm wording things.

Yea I def hear that🤘