That is NOT free and open source software
Discussion
Creative Commons is not meant for software anyways. 🙄
Which is odd because a lot of people use it as a license even though the CC website specifically says to not do that.
Oops, I just copied and pasted from a different nostr repo. Can you recommend some resources to looking at licenses?
No worries my man. MIT is probably what you'd want here? nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z uses that for Amethyst. I am not a license expert at all though.
As user I prefer MIT too. But nostr:nprofile1qqspwut66nfqu2jztndq5gv4vf9q5jnncnmfwhckk9vnljrl53hj6kqppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvh8w6tw9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tc0rh42p have a look at https://choosealicense.com/ what fits your preference as developer.
You can look at a lot of them here:
https://opensource.org/licenses/
MIT is a “do whatever you want with my work” license.
Others have various levels of restrictions, such as limiting someone from being able to keep their changes private (like GPL)
Licenses are hard and confusing. It's probably best to ask why a license was chosen.
