The provided rationale to remove limits is so weak that one can only guess what the actual motivation is, given the amount of emphasis they are giving it.

A "laundry list" of reasons is not how you build a solid case. "Wearing them out" with technical jargon, details and endless repitition does not work on actual technical people. If you have a good reason, lay it out and lead with that. If you have to buttress your main argument with weaker arguments, then you are hiding your real reason.