Replying to Avatar .

nostr:nprofile1qqsqddupn4l3cl65wggcyehd009g0pwuatsfudh28f90vewx68vrylqprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem9w3skccne9e3k7mf0wccszenhwden5te0ve5kcar9wghxummnw3ezuamfdejj7mnsw43rzufkd43hywr5d3erxmp5va6hxvmnveh8wd3hxue8xdm6v9jnv6r3de3k6ae4wa4rydm9df6kgdthvduxvdm3xph8sdmyx5lkyun0v9jxxctnws7hgun4v5q3gamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7nznd8h is cooking 🫕

""

1. A constrained custodial option, that not even the service provider can access or see the user data, if they get tapped on the shoulder.

2. Super private payment - a safebox can detect if another Lightning address has a safebox, and instead of sending fundings via the Lightning network, it is sent by private transport (#nauth)

The last couple of weeks were dedicated to implementing NWC as per NIP-47 (it’s working!!!) and tracking down a critical bug (solved!!!), now I can get to work on the above capabilities

""

🟦 ♾️ 🟦

#safebox

It’s a big deal what he’s cooking.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.