[03/05] Since you can fix the car's brakes yourself (though it will have to pass inspection), there is no reason the car's software should be treated likewise.
What about car hardware that can do surveillance? Laws should require that any cameras that can see outside the car, or passengers, be designed to blur out their faces, bodies and clothing, sufficiently that the car's computers learn only that there is something there and its rough dimensions (accurate no more than to the nearest foot).
[04/05] Cameras that look at the camera should also blur enough that they cannot identify the driver.
Laws should also require that the user can easily deactivate and reactivate each or all kinds of radio transmission and internet connectivity, except for radio-based anti-theft systems such as Lowjack. provided they are installed or activated only at the user's initiative and never by default.
nostr:npub1fznqtkx4lu37rkshgqztzx6fmc5lflnlrgert424t7hqxt6snmmsq4tde7
This is not an optimal strategy.
Penalize the use of information instead of trying to regulate its collection.
