Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

I didn't look into it very deeply, my first impressions are that it looks good but I don't think the idea should be pursued because NIP-34 and Grasp are immediately compatible with other git tooling that already exists and that is a huge plus.

Also hashtree seems to be much harder to implement and I'm a believer in simpler solutions and having dozens of implementations.
Avatar
Sirius 3d ago 💬 1

Hashtree is very simple, it's just blossom + "this is how you define directories and chunk files". Merkle roots are saved in nostr events so you can have npub/path directories whose content you can edit. Files.iris.to supports nip-34 pull requests and issues. You could use it as one remote even if you also use grasp.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
fiatjaf 3d ago

That's good to know. I guess we can have NIP-34 and two remote types: grasp and hashtree living together them. I hadn't thought about it that way.