I never said any of that, so I doubt you asked for it either. Read closer.

My argument is that Bitcoin:

a) has a centralized ledger; every resilient centralized database is distributed across multiple nodes; what makes a database centralized like Twitter is not that it's hosted on one server (lol) but that it's distributed across thousands of nodes that constantly try to sync up with a single authoritative version. What makes a database decentralized like Nostr is that there are multiple unique databases everywhere and no conception of syncing them up to be the same version, no conception of a single authoritative global state.

b) has a central planner who arbitrarily pegged the fiat amount at 21M (a figure that is nowhere in the whitepaper and can non-theoretically be edited by 1 of 6 or now 5 developers with write access to the Github account)

c) opted for a centrally planned, artificially fixed rate of supply instead of a market-determined rate of supply, which removes the primary price stabilizing mechanism

Which of these would you like me to provide further evidence of?