It’s not pinning it on him, it’s asking him how it happened. Even better, name who and what organized it. Name names. At the very least explain to us all what happened.
Anyone that has truly broken free would be dying to let the world know how his platform, the most powerful information exchange in the world was co-opted by the deep state.
Perhaps he’s afraid for his life and he can’t. Perhaps we’ll never know.
We should all continue to ask the questions.
Saying “under his watch” and listing things off is pinning it on him though which is what I responded to.
And you asking him to name names is naive in the extreme.
This isn’t a beef between some devs about a contentious change where people can have it out in the open; this is the weight of the US empire, the most violent entity on the planet that you’re asking him to go against.
The mob that chased Snowden to Russia, has Assange in Belmarsh, and made Swartz kill himself. Nevermind the laundry list of others they’ve come after.
These are not people to fuck around with because when the finding out part comes many don’t live to tell the tale.
What part of the list, and “under his watch” are inaccurate?
I didn’t say it’s inaccurate, I said it is pinning things on him which displays a lack of understanding on your part and the other fella.
You think Jack knows the ins and outs of all that shit even now?
7500 people inside Twitter dealing with dozens/hundreds of alphabet soup people. How much of it do you truly think he was aware of?
And even if he was aware of all of it, you really think he’s going to air that to satisfy your curiosity given the forces opposed?
