Thanks 🫡

Do you know if someone more it's implementing it?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Not yet. Everybody has always been so affraid of even testing it. We will see if this changes over time.

I like it, its pretty simple and straightforward, just another representation of the event without forcing a markup like EDIT: under the post. I also like the nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn proposal since its more wide and versatile... But i wonder what will happen if i do a kind1011 of a replaceable event 🤔

The kind 1011 should remain unchanged through multiple 1010s. Edits only replace the .content of the original event. They don't affect any other attached event.

A yea for sure, just first thought after read it fast... Not well thought out xD 🤦