Nostr Web Client

Very good article.

“But if we're looking at Luke through the lens of evaluating him for a leadership role in an open source project of immense global importance, as the sole maintainer of Knots I think it's quite relevant to consider his history and personal characteristics”

bitcoin is an entirely unserious project if people are even considering this person for maintainership of a 2 trillion dollar asset

nostr:nevent1qqs9qlh0ga3zks5um0nsdztpul7mwzz93t968gyxpdwt27rsu998zrczyrmj3k0xuuzgxk88pyc0tjnykzthwrvcnnxcdp20ucvwm2wg5wqsvqcyqqqqqqglwsppk

Michoe 3mo ago

Judge the code, not the man.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

jb55 3mo ago

did you read the article? it shows his dubious code and security practices

Michoe 3mo ago

Yes, but that has nothing to do with the code of Knots.

While in Core30, there is a bug where transactions with multiple op_returns will not be seen as 'non-standard' anymore after the change. As described in this PR.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406/files

Why core is not adressing that is beyond me. They just pushing it through...

jb55 3mo ago

his merges don't have anything to do with knots code? what? he has tons of unreviewed and unsigned code hosted on a server that has been compromised

Michoe 3mo ago

Yeah, but if core start willingly releasing code with bugs, you have to look for an alternative. Knots or don't upgrade.

I don't like to play it on the person. I don't care if the maintainer is a catolic with a beard or some meme-chick.