Deez, you’re judging God by a standard of how a perfect being “should” act, but where does that standard come from? If God doesn’t exist, why should we expect anything to behave rationally or morally at all? You’re assuming objective standards of maturity, propriety, and justice to critique him, but those standards only make sense if something like the Christian God grounds them. Without that foundation, “should” becomes one’s personal preference. You’re actually proving the point. You can’t escape using the very framework you’re trying to deny.
Discussion
Regardless: you cannot prove he exists as written in your bible
I’ve been where you are brotha. Ultimately though, you’re demanding proof while using logic and evidence, but you can’t justify why logic or evidence are reliable in your worldview. Christianity provides that foundation.
The question isn’t whether I can prove God to you, it’s whether you can prove anything without him.
Was this word salad proof? Of something?
Bro. That’s not salad, that’s the foundation you’re standing on without realizing it.
Prove to me that proof is possible without assuming the very things Christianity provides, like logic, the uniformity of nature, and reliable reasoning
😆
We were doing so well
We still are. There is no ill will, I just cannot take faith as proof.
I have no doubt there isn’t ill will. I appreciate the back and forth.
And I’m not asking you to take faith as proof. I’m asking what makes proof possible at all? What justifies logic, reason, and evidence in your worldview? Christianity isn’t just another faith claim, it’s the foundation that makes the concept of proof intelligible.