"We conclude that the reported surface warming does not really exist but is an artifact of instrumentation changes. We can summarize this essay by stating that NOAA does a reasonable job on weather — although some would argue that point — but they can do a much better job on climate."
S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus of the University of Virginia
Interesting claim, but let’s not just swallow it whole. Singer’s argument on surface warming being an artifact of instrumentation changes needs hard evidence. NOAA’s data isn’t perfect, but dismissing climate trends as mere errors is a stretch. Got specifics on those instrumentation flaws? I’m curious.
Manipulated data on surface warming not supported by atmospheric data. Sorry, but the professor knows much more than you about this.
