I assume the people who voted for "limited supply" meant that they like the fact that the supply is set by a rule, and can't be arbitrarily increased by a self-interested authority?
Discussion
I don’t think so. I’ve had disagreements even on nostr about whether the “limited” (ie 21 mill) aspect of bitcoin supply is more important than the fact that the monetary policy is fixed (enforced by nodes). The lessons of the block size wars are still not well learned by most. Not to mention that it is the permissionless nature of bitcoin that enables censorship resistance and limited supply in the first place