What actually breaks my Bitcoin containment thesis

TL;DR

Containment relies on perimeters (banks, app stores, clouds, pools, payment networks), not just statutes. The only way out is either (a) make those perimeters look less safe than BTC, or (b) align powerful actors’ incentives (energy, megacaps, reserves) with BTC’s success.

Bottom line: Most days, containment holds — that’s the revealed preference. But I wanted to explore what actually breaks it: trust failures at the core, public censorship optics, paper custody failure, sovereign hedging, capital controls, CBDC backfires, or a client-level schism.

More context:

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-actually-breaks-my-bitcoin-containment

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The Bitcoin containment thesis in 4 articles:

1) All governments that matter are on the same team

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/rivalry-between-countries-is-curated

2) All of the largest companies are actually the government

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/state-embedded-investment-thesis

3) All of the well-known "entrepreneurs" are actually the government

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/public-facing-elites-using-myth-making

4) Most Bitcoiners don't understand Bitcoin very well

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-most-bitcoiners-are-wrong-about

I think most of us would prefer low/zero tax and mandatory proof of reserves instead of strategic reserve policies. Eventually a state will be so desperate they’ll adopt honesty and favorable tax rules I hope 😂

Network, 1976. Great movie.

Just watched the trailer and I'm very intrigued. I'll have to watch it, ty for the recommendation.

It's the intellectual version of They Live.

I just quickly scanned this page and I don't fucking understand a thing 🤣

probably need to read through