Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar 398ja

Is David Friedemann suggesting that it's harmless for 6yo children to consume sexually explicit material on the Internet...? ๐Ÿค”

He writes:

> The Internet is a wonderful educational tool but a lot of parents assume that their children must be protected, by monitoring or filtering, from seeing too much of it. What psychological damage would be done to a six year old from seeing a picture of two humans engaged in sexual intercourse that was not done, over the centuries, to six year old farm children observing cattle engaged in the same activity for real has never been explained to me.

Is he talking about porn, or is it just me reading too much into it?

https://daviddfriedman.substack.com/p/breaking-the-walled-garden-of-childhood

Avatar
HoloKat 1y ago

Sounds like โ€œporn is fine for 6 yoโ€ ๐Ÿ˜ฌ

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
398ja 1y ago

Absolutely! He's undoubtedly smart enough to understand the difference between recording and uploading sexually explicit material on the Internet, and cattle copulating in a farm...๐Ÿ˜”

Thread collapsed