Money is an organics function.
Ink and paper usually makes consensus to handshakes of organic bonds
🕷️
Discussion
Really, but in a country like mine (Brazil), it's best to accumulate as much Bitcoin as possible, like a bear preparing for winter. This becomes even more relevant when we consider the growing pressure from authorities to reduce or even eliminate physical currency. The government, in attempting to fully digitize the economy, seeks greater control over financial transactions and, inevitably, over its citizens. Digitalization makes traceability easier, giving the state more power over individual economic activities.
When we talk about the end of physical money, we're talking about even greater centralization of monetary power, where all transactions can be monitored and controlled. In this scenario, Bitcoin emerges as a key alternative to protect financial freedom, as it operates on a decentralized network without intermediaries.
By accumulating Bitcoin, people can prepare for this "winter" of monetary control, safeguarding their wealth in an asset that resists censorship and government interference.
I truly support the mentality that money should be organic, something that grows naturally over time with demand, free from centralized control. However, when talking about the reality in my region, like Brazil, things are different. Here, economic policies and the financial landscape are often subject to government intervention, and people have to deal with constant inflation and measures that affect the value of physical money.
While other places might have more flexibility and openness to this organic approach to money, in Brazil, the instability of the financial system pushes people to seek safer alternatives, like Bitcoin, to preserve the value of what they earn. The reality is that in an environment of growing control and economic uncertainty, accumulating a decentralized currency like Bitcoin becomes a form of financial protection against government interventions and the volatility of the local economy.
make believe doesn’t need make believe money to make make believe consumerism go on.
Got it! Let's pretend we don't need make-believe money to maintain the illusion of consumerism, but we can use something less valuable than Bitcoin.
If there is a possibility to hold as many Bitcoins as possible and use Monero, I will definitely do it. Bitcoin is an excellent store of value.
I'm not imposing a law, it's just what I do and suggest. Accumulating Bitcoin and using Monero for transactions is a smart approach
Avoiding my question. Is deception a requirement for make believe to deflect from the question?
Which need does non organic economics jonesing serve?
Brother, at what point did I say that we need a non-organic economy? I said that only a donkey pays for bread using gold.
In the past, it was possible to pay with gold instead of money; did people use this alternative? Bitcoin, by itself, is already gaining value.
I’m not into bitcoin personally, nor business wise, but in regards of intelligent currencies, a solid foundation and strong infrastructure such as the federal knocks system of central fags is better than jungle safaris for bringing intelligence to.
maybe better to educate people before the jungle tribes of monkey island.
and offer intelligent currencies to the masses.
more taxes, more money.
Mais impostos? Realmente nunca vamos concordar.
Because avoiding my question, accumulated bitcoin with which entry point?!
Musical chairs?
Com dinheiro, eu não disse pra não receber em dinheiro, disse q o dinheiro q ja tem não deve estar na mão do estado, por isso que EU faço com que Todo MEU dinheiro se torne Bitcoin, não tenho nada em meu nome por uma filosofia simples, tire o estado do seu dinheiro.
Irmão, não ligo se você se acha um fodão. O que eu disse foi: pague com prata e guarde o ouro. Eu não prego nada a ninguém, apenas expus minha opinião e compartilhei algumas notícias. Nossas realidades são diferentes, e não vou me medir pela sua régua.