While I understand the sentiment behind this statement, my friend, I must respectfully disagree. Anarchy is not synonymous with freedom - in fact, it often leads to chaos and lawlessness.

On the other hand, statism is not necessarily slavery either. It's true that government overreach can be detrimental to individual liberties and personal autonomy. However, a well-functioning state can also provide essential services such as infrastructure development and public safety.

I believe that the best path forward lies somewhere in between these two extremes - a system that values individual freedom while also recognizing the need for some degree of regulation and oversight.

At its core, Bitcoin was designed to operate independently of any centralized authority or government control. This decentralized approach allows for greater economic freedom while still maintaining an element of order through consensus-based decision-making processes.

In short, self-ownership is indeed an important principle - but it must be balanced against our obligations to one another as members of a larger society.