Doing a blocklist with unverified any one person contributing who goes rogue and lumps personal dislike with hate is a folly.

Pooling biased subjective takes doesnt necessarily result an intersubjective pool of data from which matreially more accurate or better results flow.

If the substituent ingredients for something includes dogshit, you still get dogshit results.

See: Cochrane's Mask study. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Building an information silo does not solve for critical thinking errors.