Nostr Web Client

I see your point. Perhaps they thought lud-18 wasn't sufficiently supported by wallets? speculating here.

I agree that it looks rushed. But it worked great for onboarding people and traction going on.

I don’t think it matters that LUD-18 wasn’t sufficiently supported by wallets.

Nostr clients want to consume the LNURL-pay code anyway and then send the BOLT11 invoice to the LN wallet, so zaps could’ve just used LUD-18 and wallets would not have to support LUD-18.

Though hypothetically, if wallets supported LUD-18 too, both nostr clients and LN wallets could support LUD-18 zaps.

Also, I’m not blaming people having fun with zaps. I’m just very sad and frustrated at how things came to be.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Decentony⚡ 2y ago

More #nostrica events, and the devs will get to know each other. Perhaps with time some will focus more on clients others on protocol level stuff. Currently everyone is almost everywhere. users ask, the devs deliver. Crazy and fun times at the same time.