Big difference between climate hysteria and Malthusian/communist ideas, and accepting the vast amounts of data/evidence that mankind is affecting the climate and we should work towards mitigating that impact while protecting human flourishing. - your future blocked commie friend
Discussion
The logical conclusion of climate change is the extinction of humanity. It’s scientific original sin. The byproduct of your existence pollutes the world. It’s insane nonsense designed to guilt people into being poorer and subjugating themselves into global communism
Trying to curb climate change from emissions is very different than global communism. There are ways to produce vast energy abundance, ie nuclear, while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, and doing so in a very capitalist manner without communism.
All creatures affect their environment. I think trying to preserve our planet and environment is a worthy cause, but not to the detriment of human civilization. It’s not black and white.
Work towards mitigating our impact in what way?
Reducing emissions as much as possible while maintaining energy abundance. Embracing nuclear baseload as a major part of the solution. Travesty that nuclear basically solved energy scarcity AND potential climate change, yet has been languishing, particularly in the US due to lobbying and regulatory hurdles. We should be rapidly advancing nuclear technology and buildout.