You are correct. The vast majority of things in one's life are just as worthy of your time (if not more worthy) when the people providing these things are motivated by financial return. And yes, this principle applies to the quality of online content as well.

However I do not use Nostr to view that sort of content; I use Nostr to talk with people. I want to try to understand every belief and learn every relevant perspective. These matters of perspective are the exception to the rule. Motivations of possible financial return undermine the authenticity of the conversation and make it less worthy of a person's time.

The value of things like conversation and friendship are not things that can be objectively measured by the person receiving them. I believe Nostr should be partially unpleasant. I want to interact with the jerks. If I didn't believe in the importance of treating jerks with respect and fairness then I wouldn't have choosen the username "Scoundrel" to use when presenting and defending my beliefs.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think you'll still end up finding plenty of authentic conversations on Nostr, and even that desired unpleasant side from time to time. After all, many folks around here have more than one npub, and while they may keep a more congenial public persona on their main profile, they may be more willing to let loose on alternate nostr:npubs.

totally - for instance, I am actually nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424 , but when I get sick of the lies, I pull out my shadow persona nostr:npub1ljxdldrq885zamfkn82k7zcjs4lrsf9wykrh9e3hq4thh89vlzxsr83h7d and can really let loose!

😉🤫

Knew it

haha just messin with the mostly benevolent nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424

Sure sure, I'm on to you Derek