No problem with immigration, really necessary. Replacement, on the other hand, NO.

nostr:note1g8c4jluspfn6l7csvjdq4u04kzvx2lkgyw7sc2qmd05phcs0wxxs6ytcy2

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Taking away whether it’s β€œgood or bad”, why is it really necessary?

Because there’s always a need for movement, certain asylum, skills, genuine refugees.

This is so clearly a multi decade agenda to replace though

Those seem like niceties more than necessities to me.

Asylum so as not to be killed is a necessity i assure you πŸ˜‚

No doubt - from the asylum seeker’s perspective. Thought we were talking about the other side πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

Immigration would be acceptable if instead of imposing foreign culture, the people would participate with their own culture without oppressing the others and adhering to the value of the country they go live in.

It is unthinkable to see women dehumanized like they do in middle eastern or north african countries.

Or to accept infibulation as cultural quirk, instead of a violent practice.

Agree 🀝