📇⬇️ policy:
i think all of the approaches are wrong. i do not think displacement is appropriate bc that's stealing land for the us... i think the point of israel annexing gaza and the west bank allows for a plo and israel coalition to make their own state federation which is a local insular approach. i think allowing the west to meddle in the process reengages the double standard of the rhetorical zion and the european co opting of the holy land. israel annexing palestinian areas is the safest and most concrete way to form a local stronghold that is not under western control. the end. the west fucks up the holy land every fucking generation. every single time. if we want to have a serious conversation about the issues in the holy land they are all directly related to western meddling in some way regarding control of the territory for esoteric reasons. the desire to "fix" the holy land at the top is completely irrelevant to the ground situation - it is about regaining control and status for the region. simple as that. and the bohemian grove links through the bushes are the saudi "investment" agendas. the bushes are cia along with clinton and it is irresponsible to imagine the sauids are invested in the security and independence of the holy land. it is about imperial control. it is a sale. it is a boondoggle and it is to allow the sauids ground control of the region by proxy for the us shadow elites. it's bullshit. so when i say israel should annex palestine it is in the spirit of cooperation like in the paper i wrote days after oct 7 on oct 10. there is no excuse for the west to once again believe the lie of western assistance when for 2 thousand years regional destabilization is a direct result of western meddling - "helping". white christian's always "helping" jews and muslims is itself a supremacy complex.
the kushners are euro trash scumbags.
france needs to recalculate its rhetoric on russia.
