Absolutely! But if #btc can be manipulated via majority holdership, what's the difference?
Discussion
A lot.
Plebs for one.
If the whales sell, there are sooooo many hungry plebs ready to eat it all up. As they say in normie land, we are psychopaths 🤣
Also unlike fiat it only hurts the whale to sell. All value will naturally flow to the hardest asset.
I'm not the best to answer this, but if you haven't yet, check out The Bitcoin standard and The fiat standard by Saifedean Ammous. It can answer all your questions on a much higher level than me.
Thats really only matters if you care about dollar price. Its a trope but 1 btc = 1 btc. If we really are out here to replace the dollar then thinking of Bitcoin in dollar value is pointless.
Not to say that bitcoin fixes the money hording issue of people like saylor but eventually (and this is making a lot of assumptions here) if the dollar fails and we use bitcoin more like money rather than just a savings asset people like saylor will be forced to use that bitcoin. He might still have a small hord but id assume the supply would much more "even" for a lack of a better way to say it.
Might be off my ass here but this is kinda how i think about it.
distribution of the supply*
Derp