I think I linked to the wrong example. Though it's a similar phenomena. This one got rejected for being in a too large unconfirmed chain:

2023-08-18T09:27:32.705237Z [net] got inv: wtx 8c235cb0eb540ed75aeebca5d3beeb0c0d968b8590b1ddf31ed87f997e2ea3b8 new peer=50

2023-08-18T09:27:32.706424Z [net] Requesting wtx 8c235cb0eb540ed75aeebca5d3beeb0c0d968b8590b1ddf31ed87f997e2ea3b8 peer=50

2023-08-18T09:27:33.912485Z [mempoolrej] 8c235cb0eb540ed75aeebca5d3beeb0c0d968b8590b1ddf31ed87f997e2ea3b8 from peer=50 was not accepted: too-long-mempool-chain, too many descendants for tx cca29e4a3f560b3414e47feede6de0c2d9cb94af535780479e531f14bd003395 [limit: 25]

The chain was too long from the point of view of my node, because it hadn't seen the confirmations yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.