Here's your summary from Laura Ingraham: NY v Trump prosecutors are 'trying to make a dead dog bark' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRQxvkpRAU0) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** The video discusses the ongoing court proceedings involving the Trump team's handling of inconvenient stories, the immunity case at the Supreme Court, and the distinction between official and private acts.
- The Trump team successfully normalized American Media Inc.'s practice of getting rid of inconvenient stories for high-profile individuals.
- The prosecution's focus on salacious details was overshadowed by the defense's argument that no crime was committed in the bookkeeping.
- The Supreme Court is leaning towards denying immunity for the President in criminal matters, emphasizing the distinction between official and private acts.
- Justices in the Supreme Court are approaching the case as a decision for the ages, not just a case about Donald Trump.
- The discussion delves into the potential implications for future presidents and the importance of finding a middle ground on immunity.
In the video, Laura Ingraham provides insights into the ongoing court proceedings, highlighting the defense's successful normalization of American Media Inc.'s practices and the Supreme Court's leaning towards denying immunity for the President in criminal matters. The discussion also emphasizes the broader implications for future presidents and the importance of distinguishing between official and private acts in legal proceedings.
Overall, the video sheds light on the complexities of the legal system, the nuances of presidential immunity, and the significance of finding a balance between accountability and protection for sitting presidents.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb