Real conspiracies involve small groups with aligned interests and leave evidence over time through leaks or investigations. This would require perfect coordination across dozens of institutions and hundreds of people with no leaks, no inconsistencies, no one breaking ranks. Kirk was doing live events and maintaining his normal public schedule right up until he was killed. There’s a clear, documented trail.

The difference between healthy skepticism and paranoid thinking is asking: what level of coordination would this require, and is that actually plausible? Some institutional distrust is absolutely warranted based on history, but I don’t believe this is one.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That video showing this many blunders barely 2 weeks after the event shows they did sloppy work, didn't account for all angles, didn't have time to prepare, didn't fully control the parameter. It could even be considered a mockery the way they handled this. Just like the JFK and 9/11 events crumbled soon after for everyone willing to dig and look, until the stage is drowned in disinfo agents again, to muddy the waters.

I don't buy the whole "unlikely because too many would know". It's a mix of compartmentalization, ignorance, secret societies, cults and corruption. We only learned of large scale government, intelligence agency and war crimes decades after the fact.

I don't see the paranoia. The speech by his wife, the military ads, the similar rhetoric used by influencers, the the calls for cancellation by the anti-cancellation crowd, the artificial boosting of the video of the alleged assassination when these are usually purged due to showing brutal violence, the military recruitment campaign. Nah, it's all theatre.

I'll gladly adapt my stance after further information is shared and analyzed so I don't fall for dogna though.

All fair points. The government will always take a tragedy and spin it to their benefit. Always. I’m patiently waiting as well.

Paranoia is believing that the world is out to get you.

Skepticism is simply asking the question is this true & what evidence is there to the contrary?

Everyone wants you to believe & agree to their version of reality. The more they want you to believe their version, the more skeptical I become. The truth should be self evident, it does not require protection or a campaign.

The truth always has a way of rising to the surface, even if the water is thick with mud.