Our threading seems to be pretty good these days. I am not sure what needs to be done.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes, more trying to figure out how much work/cost it takes to revamp UI? How big would the bounty need to be to build your threading system back before you did it?

Like is it an hour, a day, a week of work? Literally no idea, which makes making bounties hard.

5M should get some interest. But it depends on the final goal. Devs need to build what they believe can work.

I like the approach where you can just scroll to read instead of having to click through the entire thread manually. I don’t mind twitters implementation here.

So twitter for me seems to show replies in the order that the original poster has replied to most recently. Other than that idk how they’re sorted. But it does seem to work

The Reddit/Apollo way is actually like this because they only expand the reply tree under each comment a set number of steps before collapsing it with an expand on tap button, then it jumps back to a top level reply again and repeats.

Twitter seems to do this if the original poster is replying, otherwise it maybe shows the first reply of a Blue subscriber, mostly just first level replies in a list.

I think the advantage of Reddit’s model is it surfaces the most engaged comments at the top with the most replies and discussion. You could have a great long thread between ppl in Twitter replies but if the original poster hasn’t been part of it recently it might not show to most users very prominently.

In nostr world, most engaged can mean most zapped. Or whatever user chosen sorting of the replies. Most zapped, most replies, most recent, etc