What's something that you used to strongly believe, that you now know was false?
#asknostr
Discussion
That there will be bitcoin 2.0
Pretty much all of it.
The US landing people on the moon between 1969-72.
I'm legit nervous about looking into this in case the hoax theory is true.
Nevertheless, let's do it.
What's the single best argument that the moon landings were a hoax?
1. No country or the US has replicated it in over 50 years despite massive advances in computing power.
2. Many records have been lost, despite it being the most amazing feat in human history.
3. Ability for humans to go beyond the radiation of the Van Allen belts is questionable.
4. Cinematography was advanced enough to create a hoax noting the Cold War was in effect and the USSR was the first to space (motive).
5. Watch Bart Sibrel who has investigated this for many years: https://www.brighteon.com/0c8a5913-93ca-4ffa-ad64-1e467011ab58
For the time being, humans will more likely use robots for space exploration.
Hmm, that's kind of a laundry list. Of those which would you say is the strongest argument?
Sometimes it has to be a collage as no one thing is highly probable, but combined is.
That said, the likeliest issue to overcome is the Van Allen belt.
NASA says they found the thinnest part and the astronauts only spent a little time going through it. However the radiation is intense and the astronauts did not seem to be affected at all.
It is discouraging as an inability to pass through the Van Allen belt means there will be no way to get to Mars except through robotics. Perhaps humans could be incubated there?
Letβs see what SpaceX can do and why not go (back) to the moon before Mars.
a 'laundry list' label
is meant to belittle
but all important events
must be seen in scope
each item supports another
well done
No doubt multiple points can be used to support a hypothesis.
But for the purposes of discussion, I like to deal with one point at a time. It's helpful to avoid getting sidetracked.
So I read a little about the Van Allen belt. https://www.popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts/
I did find the claim that the belts are shaped like donuts convincing. A lot of magnetic fields are shaped like that. So it is plausible to me that the radiation is much less dense in places.
Leave it with you to investigate further.
Oh I'm a little disappointed. I was hoping you'd stand up a defence, or if unable to do so, concede the point.
The information is there for you to review. Then you must come to your own conclusion given the evidence.
All the best and happy with whatever your determination is.
This considers many events but primarily the moon landing.
https://www.brighteon.com/0936b88d-54ba-44b2-94d3-b7c6acbed6f0
That the western world are the "good guys".
Gun control is net beneficial to society
Flags and nation states.
That the world runs on trust π. It doesnβt.
I was trying to will into existence a room temperature superconductor a few months ago.
You would've been a rich rich man had you succeeded.
I was but a cheerleader for what were apparently a bunch of con artists who destroyed their scientific reps for no good reason.
That sucks, I wish they'd stick to perpetual motion schemes
"I'm from the government and I'm here to help."