I spoke about this last week.

The benefit of decentralisation comes with some drawbacks backs. Coordination around comms being one.

Anyway. I expect more of this shit to happen in the coming years; so we’ll have more chances.

Perhaps another approach is at the company/product level, not product. Much easier to have a message from Primal or Satlantis than it is from “Nostr”.

Extrapolating that out…The more companies / products we have building/built ON Nostr, the more they can go to market with a clear message (individually).

Each message appeals to different groups of people, but ultimately they each find their way to Nostr.

🤔

nostr:note1dvvvx4u6px473maa6teezyk7dkk982rwjlva05h65u8eudxh4xsqp7hz30

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If you consider “coordination” a drawback of decentralization, then you don’t understand the purpose of decentralization. Modern thinkbois need to think harder.

Are you stupid ?

You obviously can’t read

Coordination regarding how the network works, is a feature. But thats not what I said.

“Coordination around communications” is 10000% a drawback.

It’s a necessary tradeoff to make, but whatever way you dice it, it’s a drawback. Hence why centralised shit platform like BlueSky gets WAY more marketing advantage than the technically superior decentralised one (Nostr).

I’m torn between explaining how ridiculous your “thought” was or just insulting you.