Yeah, you could do all sorts of refinements. An obv simple first pass would be to weigh by follower count. Better still by "real" followers (graperank type logic), etc.

like Derek has a lot of mutes. Some likely just a volume of exposure thing. Some too from people who may feel neutral about him, but he makes it into their feed anyway with secondary engagement, leads to resentment and a mute. I dunno

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It'll be interesting to see. These kinds of analyses will be possible with what I'm planning. Nostr stalker paradise.

Get busy deving

I'm on vacation and in a food coma. I'll get right on it.

Jay about to cook. Let him 🀣

This is what peak software development looks like.

All in the hips. The good keystrokes all come from there

Hips don't lie πŸ’ƒ

Truth bearing hips 🀣

Curvy hipβ€”i mean uh, honesty is a virtue πŸ˜‚

Absolutely 🀭🀭🀭

The Brainstorm prototype calculates muter count, total and GrapeRank-filtered. Same for followers and reporters. Graph databases make it easy to craft queries like this and to play around with more complex ones.

Looks like the Mute-O-Scope casts a wider net in terms of raw data, based on the total muter counts. One of the first decisions of a Brainstorm instance owner/operator will be which relays to draw data from.

https://straycat.brainstorm.social/profile.html?pubkey=3f770d65d3a764a9c5cb503ae123e62ec7598ad035d836e2a810f3877a745b24

You should do some mobile responsive optimizations to add a hamburger menu and eliminate content overflow.

Yeah, I have not had the bandwidth to give much love to the front end πŸ˜…. Too much back end stuff to figure out.

And we’re looking at rebuilding it from scratch. Want to help? πŸ˜ƒ

I don’t really have the bandwidth for that right now.

Well, it seems like you can finish the minor details from here without me. YW