Nothing about wanting to own more land, as long as it is acquired by moral means is bad or oppressive. Your desire to restrict my ability to own property is evil. You literally have no right nor moral justification for saying that I should not own more than I can use or occupy.

Firstly: who are you to judge that?

Secondly: you still have not produced a morally consistent reason that non-occupatory ownership is wrong. Example: I don't need a car and a scooter, but guess what? I want a scooter to further minimize my commute costs. In your model, this is bad since I can't obviously drive both at once. This is asinine.

If I work my balls off to have the ammassed wealth to trade for more land and I find someone willing to trade what I have for the land without coercive measures on either party, it is literally none of your effing business what I do with that land, when I do it, with the exception being if I'm doing something that negatively effects my immediately adjacent neighbors.