My point was that the WEF has publicly supported Bitcoin. Your point was that this means they are somehow trying to get rid of it (???).

I responded by juxtaposing the two stances (public support vs. your claim that this means they are trying to get rid of Bitcoin) to show that it is ridiculous, and you responded by asking me where I'm from instead of showing me that your point is not, in fact, ridiculous.

The ball is in your court, and you are the one making yourself appear ignorant.