“The same Republicans trying to put a man accused of child sex trafficking at the top of the DOJ and an anti-vaxxer atop HHS, are telling us that the reason they're banning drag queens, gender affirming care & books with two mommies is because they want to 'protect our kids.'”
Has there been proof presented in the cases you mention? Wasn't there was a doj investigation with no charges brought? And this resurfaced with a lone allegation immediately after Gaetz was nominated.
I have heard RFK Jr say several times he is not against vaccines but he is against forced experimental vaccinations and against censoring information that might be inconvenient for the medical industry.
You are for forced vaccinations!? We live in the richest, most unhealthy country in the world. You agreed the food and pharmaceutical industries are captured. And yet you support the same "professionals" and politicians who have perpetuated the problem?
It really seems like you are just want the side you like to win and that you don't really care about the truth.
You want politicians, as long as they are democrats to regulate and censor free speech? Ridiculous.
Well it will impact the whole country if there is another pandemic, RFK Jr is already saying he will cut funding for infectious diseases. I’m not sure how people forgot part of the reason we had a massive pandemic in 2020 is because Trump’s administration cut funding and staffing for public health for the 3 years prior.
Last November, according to NBC News, Kennedy told an antivaccine group, “I’m gonna say to NIH scientists, ‘God bless you all. Thank you for public service. We’re going to give infectious disease a break for about eight years.’”
As if infectious diseases are going to give us a break if we stop researching them 🙄
In theory, let's say there is another pandemic, you are saying we should do what was done last time?
Are you saying the government should bypass the extreme ethical problems with forcing medicine on people, controlling information and forcing people to stop interacting with each other, arbitrarily close businesses because we are told it could be dangerous?
Like last time, it's impossible to close everything. Gyms and yoga studios were closed, people were even arrested alone on the beach.
Fast food, groceries, liquor stores and large corporate businesses stayed open and were massively profitable.
So you are advocating for some people to arbitrarily lose their business, and let the hourly workers serve everybody living off the government or who are able to work from home for the massive corporations. You don't see a conflict there?
You don't see the potential for a broken healthcare system pushing through therapeutics and medicine to make money? Or any incentive for the government or corrupt politicians?
And if they force people to take medicine against their will, or use things like respirators and people have major health problems what happens? An injured individual has much less influence power or resources than medicine companies.
You are advocating for authoritarian rule under the guise of safety. It's not ok to force medicine on people. Or to force people out of business or to stop them from interacting. They are adults just like you. You want to give them information? Great. Anything beyond that is unethical. If you are worried, you should stay home. People are not going to stay inside on the wishes of the government to "nip it in the bud" early. Not going to happen, as mentioned above it's literally impossible and most of the world is going to carry on regardless anyway. Especially people who don't pay attention to the media and the powers that be or live outside their reach.
This statement is idiocy at its finest
