Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

What would it look like, if an emergent money was being monetized?

Often when I talk with academics or other high-IQ critics of bitcoin, it’s the volatility and seemingly speculative aspect of it that turns them off. It’s almost distasteful to them. They can get behind the idea of global open-source payments and so forth, “but that’s not why people buy it” they’ll say. “They buy it because they’re speculating. It’s too volatile for its own good.” Some aspect of them dislikes it in principle, almost *because* one can make money from it.

But a new decentralized money, including its own unit of account and liquidity, doesn’t just emerge as a multi-trillion dollar-equivalent network out of the box. In order to go from zero to trillions in market capitalization and liquidity, it needs upside volatility. And with upside volatility comes speculation, leverage, and downside volatility. Cycle after cycle, it’s priced like an option. At first it’s like a 0.1% chance that it succeeds in the long run. And then in the next cycle it’s like 1%. And then in the next cycle it’s like 5%, and so forth. So, early capital allocators that have seen a thing or two and know the high failure rate of new ideas will say, “This’ll probably fail, but if it doesn’t, both the investment gains and the macro implications will be enormous.” And then 15 years into it with a few more cycles under its belt, the probability of success looks less like a distant moonshot and more like a real possibility, and then eventually starts to look like the base case. In the beginning the question is, “how will this succeed?” and at later stages the question becomes, “what risks could prevent this from continuing to succeed?”

The process of buying bitcoin is often a speculative process at first, but then as people learn more, they often view it differently. Those that really want speculation will then continue down the pipeline of altcoins- there’s always some shiny new object to try to speculate on. On the other hand, those who begin viewing bitcoin as money, start to view it as a defensive or risk-off act to hold a piece of this liquid and globally decentralized network of value. One would feel too financially exposed not to.

I think their main concern still needs to be addressed. Namely how an asset with high volatility can be used as a currency.

Imagine trying to take a loan in BTC, you will have no idea how much it’s going to cost to repay.

For those that argue stating the high inflation with today's fiat, keep in mind that inflation only goes in one direction. While it certainly isn’t good, it is still more manageable as a currency than a volatile asset.

While runaway inflation may push people towards BTC. It is still more a storage of value than a usable currency.

The day a decentralized system figures out an answer to the volatility problem, is the day it replaces fiat.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's the thing. It's won't be significantly less volatile until it's like 10x bigger in terms of size and liquidity.

There's no "solution" to the volatility other than just that it's bigger, more widely held, more understood, and with fewer risks.

So many do not understand this point. Maybe we need a good metaphor.

I have thought the same. Some entrepreneurs want to wait until that time, others interested in exploring options sooner rather than later.

The 4-year sharpe ratio of Bitcoin outperforms every other asset over its entire existence. Treat it like a 4-year bank certificate of deposit and watch your wealth skyrocket.

Bitcoin is a currency (space) technology AND bitcoin is a savings (time) technology. It is the best money ever available to humanity.

If the volatility concerns you, invest less in bitcoin. If you want to save more in bitcoin because it outperforms everything over enough time but you can’t save as much as you want, spend less.

Bitcoin isn’t negotiable. Using it comes at a cost. Adapt your life and decisions appropriately.

same applies for fiat ("how much it's going to cost to repay"): price prediction under fiat explodes out too...

https://void.cat/d/KQi8srdJVKtLn1XpuvRYem.webp

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3919203

Volatility will reduce as Bitcoin matures.

Gold was quite volatile compared to the elastic fiat money of today but that was usually caused by miners finding more/less gold or trade deficits/surpluses between countries.

Time will tell how Bitcoin fares.