adoption at the cost of advantaging those who are literally throwing money at this without any concept of a business at the end, which is partly why some really dumbshit is being done, almost nobody is building a business here, and you are proposing to remove the only feature that they ARE supporting that enables money to flow into the treasuries of development shops?

better to get slow, gradual adoption and a faster track to self-funding than doing retarted things like removing one of the most novel and unique features of the protocol

i suppose you are being funded by a grant also... and don't seem to get it that it would be better if it was paying customers