No, I don't want to see your nudey-boys.
Men taking their clothes off inappropriately just reduces the amount of information I am receiving, to determine how attractive I find him, and increases my suspicion that he lacks discipline.
No, I don't want to see your nudey-boys.
Men taking their clothes off inappropriately just reduces the amount of information I am receiving, to determine how attractive I find him, and increases my suspicion that he lacks discipline.
men should be wearing fleeces at all times, especially if they're devs
i'm currently wearing two
I'll raise you your two fleeces by a black band T-Shirt and some antistatic shoes.
Will velcro orthopedic shoes do?
You're not willing to go full Birkenstock, then?
Far too classy.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=488x325&blurhash=rEFO%7Dy4oOZRjWFNHNeRiWX9GozkCWYR.xCt5offk%25i9aIVoLofocs%2BtRod01-pxtWXWAozs.NGWB_MIpjrR.jEV%5BnhoIWCshIUxtobxuNHR.t7of&x=e647cb64358a1bc6ce75093cc56ce8d430af7bda9d7af079d43d9244238623be
Clothes convey information because someone selected them and is wearing them for some particular reason.
I want to know his reasons.
I am extremely picky about reasons.
Agreed.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=612x484&blurhash=%237C%258Jxu00M%7B%7EqD%25IUM%7B%25M%25Mt7t7M%7BofWBWBRjxu4nay-%3BWBM%7B%25MWBj%5Bofj%5BM%7BRjt7WBxuofWBof%25MWBayWBWBfQt7WBM%7BWBj%5BxuWBWBWBWBoffQWBRjayayofofRjWBof&x=5c5d656c412db683f145b503e78cb677d0632875e92feebec44e82a7dd6c25ab
Isn't that the Wüstenfuchs? 👀
Erwin Rommel, indeed.
Proves the point.
He's more attractive to me in the uniform. Probably wouldn't even have recognized him in a bathing suit.
Did you expect me to respond like that, or the opposite way?
Just curious. 🤔
I can't decide if my recognizing him and feeling star-struck says good or bad things about me. 😂
Well, I guess it says I've spent an unusual amount of time reading about military history, for a woman.
When I'm not thinking about the Romans, I'm thinking about the Wehrmacht.
Me? I expect nothing, but you answer makes good sense.
Here's another one.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=236x306&blurhash=_FE%7BkN%25M9F-%3BRjxu%25MRj%7Eq-%3B9F-%3BM%7BIUIUIU-%3B%3Fb9FIU%25M9FD%25j%5BD%25t7t7RjIURjRjIUt7j%5BayxuD%25M%7BxuIURjj%5BRjayM%7BD%25t7ofof%3FbIUM%7BxuayWBWBM%7B%25MxuRjM%7Bj%5Bof&x=119381506f30808ae8d658ec122928218d11c69ba517fb78d01077ad450d3555
I saw a study on this once, but can’t find it now. They took a bunch of guys and had women rate their attractiveness on looks alone first. Then they made up profiles for them, giving the least attractive ones great jobs and salary, and the most attractive shitty jobs and salary.
Then they took these profiles to women and had them rate the guys attractiveness. Participants were instructed just to rate the attractiveness, even though the profile info was right there on the page.
The women found the high-income guys the most attractive, irrespective of the earlier, pre-profile ratings.
Well, duh. Not starving or freezing to death, or having to live in a dangerous neighborhood, sounds like a pretty attractive deal to me.
There's a reason why high income correllates to paternity.