https://chatgpt.com/share/67b0c6b4-6264-800e-a42b-dc06c026eb55

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I believe there is a fundamental misunderstanding here. I'm saying the government is using AI enslave you with surveillance-powered enforcement and mass manipulation of all knowledge. They want you to not read anything, and just obey what that spits out. The old SEO just mirrored society, but the new algorithms shape it.

And you're asking the AI if I'm right?!

So giving people access to more information faster, from more sources than ever before is leading us to enslavement...?

Sorry, but thats not a very strong argument.

And I don't respect scare tactics to sell users products or services they don't need.

There are tons of ways to use AI. And it took me less than 30 sec to know exactly why Mullvad is still the best VPN provider around.

True or false:

The creators of AI shape what it outputs

?

True: The creators of any particular AI tool (or search engines, websites, books...) influence its outputs through design decisions, training data selection, and fine tuning. If the training data is common and reliable, the model's responses will be more cohesive and factual. Distortions or biases in the data harm the models testing and user performance. This is why early #woke AI models like Google's suck and as they removed those perspectives and guardrails, the models performance improved. Its still nowhere near as good as OpenAI but you see the point.

For some things, like a neutral subject such as pet hair, AI may be indeed a great tool

But for something advertised as "suppressed by big tech", with new original thoughts from the creator, in a brand new podcast... you're essentially saying "I do not care what you think. I only refer to the exact authority you're disputing"

In which case, there is no real purpose of Nosr. As you're saying you only have blind loyalty to the dictators over at Google

There are literally hundreds of AI models made by various companies and open source projects that anyone can use. It's no different than a book, website or search engine. If you don't like the answer then use a different tool.

The references in the Deep Research article that I generated were extremely thorough. So yes, I do trust that comprehensive research over your assertion against Mullvad.

Hey man, I understand your skepticism but allow me to re-frame this.

Our organization is mostly volunteers who create content and do development/programming at below market rates for the cause of liberty. We have both identified and then presented original solutions to the problems of Mullvad. These ideas are not widely debated, because there is a low profit margin in doing so. The VPN companies, Big Tech, and government are all very interested in suppressing them. And it requires a high attention and tech interest to comprehend them.

We are going against the grain, to innovate and develop solutions. This particular audio podcast may indeed have been miss-marketed. However, the points are solid. If you're interested in hearing honest and true criticism of mainstream products, and then solutions and ideas for those problems, this is it.

However, if you are just going to be pessimistic, without any actual flaw in the ideas, unfortunately our organization does not have time to devote to helping you. Further, it is unclear why you are interacting with us, if you do not want to hear our expertise on the exact subject the entire channel is about. Best of luck