We need no post office. Privatize it all.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m not so sure that’s a good idea either, but there definitely need to be some major reforms.

Pen Czar needed

We joke, and yet somewhere, there’s a basement full of troglodytes whose sole job it is to source pens for USPS on a no-bid contract. You just know it.

Look man, everyone can have their perfect world wishlist, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. Taxes and the Post Office are written into the United States Constitution, so there’s no getting around either of those for the time being.

So is “shall not be infringed.” Most things are fungible. Progress is a constant battle.

Yeah, but that was an amendment. This stuff is in Article I.

Also, the “shall not be infringed” part comes after the “well regulated Militia” part so you don’t get to just cherry-pick the words you like.

The Constitution doesn't require Congress to establish a post office; it merely grants them the power to.

And they did. It would probably take an amendment to abolish it. Good luck getting that ratified by two thirds of the states.

No amendment would be required. The Post Office was established by an act of Congress. An act of Congress could abolish it.

Glad they’ve never had the power to tax all Americans on everything they bring in… even if they allow the IRS to mislead most through deceptive wording! #nonresidentalien FTW 🤔😉😁

Because I’d rather pay FedEx 10x to deliver a letter that the Post Office will deliver for 52c. Post Office problems exist because competing industries lobby to eviscerate it. Privatization doesn’t improve efficiency unless the 30% profit margin that they extract is used to lobby against public services that our government is supposed to provide. This is the basis for financial capitalism…convince the people that everything related to government is “bad,” and that shifting profit into the hands of corporations is somehow better for the people. Because no corporation ever exploited their social responsibility.

You’re a socialist. That’s ok. Own it.

Chill, my dude. Politics is a spectrum, and most of what goes on in the halls of power is bullshit anyway. Some of the things I hear hardcore ancaps say is just as ridiculous as what you’ll find on the far left. It’s like when your video game spaceship flies off one side of the screen and reappears on the other side.

Thanks, Daniel, but that’s not required. I know exactly what I’m saying.

You must have forgotten that this isn’t twitter.

Why are we even still discussing this, if you’re not open to people having different points of view? That’s exactly what Twiddler is for.

I am completely open. I don't benefit from you attempting to police/steer my speech or responding with juvenile gifs. That's all.

I’d much rather discuss ideas than have them packaged for me as permissible or disallowed ideologies. To dismiss any idea as “socialist” because you’re told that it should be packaged thus, or “capitalist” because you are told that it must be packaged thus, not only removes you from any meaningful discourse, but enslaves you to the rhetorical tricks of the powerful classes that benefit from your complicity.

Absolutely. Labels enslave ideas, just as much as ignorance or bias.

In other words, if you think you aren’t being manipulated, that’s exactly what they want you to think. 😏