🔖 Title: Pull-req to enable Full-RBF by default

🏷️ Categories: bitcoin-dev

nostr:naddr1qqjrsctzxccxzvrz956kxdf3956ryenx943rxcfe94jnvwfev93njdehxasnyqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqguwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6at5d9h8jampd3kx2apwvdhk6q3q2llycjh8gg2lhy4aph9c5au8ch5s0km5axrlxrc6e24dnsaqyu0sxpqqqp65wwn42q9

⚠️ Heads up! We've now started linking to replaceable long-form events (NIP-23), which allow for dynamic display of thread details like summaries, authors, and more. If you're unable to see this, your client may not support this feature yet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

📅 Original date posted:2023-07-31

🗒️ Summary of this message: The implementation of full Replace-by-Fee (RBF) could negatively impact merchants and users who rely on 0-conf transactions. GAP600 has seen strong usage of their service and believes the adoption of RBF will change their business.

📝 Original message:

This would unnecessarily and extremely negatively impact merchants and

users who choose to accept 0-conf while using mitigation tools like GAP600.

This negative impact could be avoided by simply adding first seen safe rule

- ie a trx can be replaced but needs to include the original outputs.

At GAP600 we continue to see strong use of our service for BTC we have seen

circa 350k unique trx hash per month (over the last 3 months) requested to

our platform. Our clients include - Coinpayments, Coinspaid and Changelly.

Given the period of Mempool being full we have seen an increase in the fee

required in order to be approved by our platform for trx. This is not an

insignificant use case and one which can be easily maintained as is.

We have provided further statistics in the past and direct feedback from

Coinspaid CEO with in the mailing list see here -

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2022-December/021240.html

We have not seen any impact of full RBF on double spend rates for our trxs

which seems to put in large question the stated figure of 40% adoption by

miners at such a rate of adoption we would expect to see a large increase

in double spends. We expect once this setting becomes default this will

greatly change the adoption of this service.

GAP600 model targets not to get it wrong and as such we are very sensitive

to any double spend which we get wrong in predicting as we reimburse our

clients. GAP600 is not a payment processor; rather services payment

processors, merchants and non custodial liquidity providers which service

non-custodial wallets.

________________________________

Daniel Lipshitz

GAP600| www.gap600.com

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230731/af47128d/attachment.html>