nostr:npub1e0z776cpe0gllgktjk54fuzv8pdfxmq6smsmh8xd7t8s7n474n9smk0txy recently mentioned that sighash flags are neater than raw script opcodes to achieve the same thing. I want to gently disagree: I think of sighhash flags as a shortcut, which ideally would *expand* into script. Something like (untested!):

# Split flags word(s) off from signature, leaving on stack

OP_DUP OP_SIZE 64 OP_SUB OP_LEFT:

# Enforce any "you must set this" flags.

OP_DUP OP_AND OP_EQUALVERIFY

# Extract those parts of the tx onto the stack, append the flags, and hash them.

OP_DUP OP_TX OP_SWAP OP_CAT OP_SHA256

# Now cut the flags word(s) off the signature copy, leaving " " on the stack

OP_SWAP OP_SIZE 64 OP_SUB OP_RIGHT

# Check the signature.

OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK OP_VERIFY

You can actually see how OP_SPLIT would help us here, but also you can see exactly how much work OP_CHECKSIG does under the covers!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.