:opinion: Theory:

My theory is that the Trump administration invested an initial amount in wBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin) rather than directly in BTC or BTC ETFs to create the beginnings of a strategic bitcoin reserve by proxy. This choice allowed them to benefit from DeFi features like yield generation and advanced smart contract functionality, all while the actual Bitcoin remained under custodial oversight. It could also serve as a test run for directly holding real BTC, given that wBTC can eventually be redeemed 1:1 for Bitcoin once secure on-chain smart contracts become more sophisticated. In the meantime, the relationship with the custodians would function almost like self-custody, due to the strong regulatory authority the government could exert.

However, direct BTC ownership is generally superior because it avoids the centralization risks that come with a custodial framework. Holding wBTC means depending on a third party to manage the underlying Bitcoin. I want to emphasize that this scenario is purely speculative; there is no official confirmation or publicly verifiable data to substantiate these claims. Nonetheless, it presents one way the U.S. government might have discreetly started exploring a long-term position in #Bitcoin and the broader digital asset space.

:reward: Share > Like > Comment = ⚡️21

:topreward: Top Comment = ⚡️500

(For 24 hrs Only)

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

SBR > Solana Bitcoin Ripple ?

An interesting insight. I think they are being (or trying to be) careful not to cause an uproar in the market

They are aware all their cellos are broken

É difícil para qualquer governo aceitar o bitcoin e perder o controle sobre a população. Bitcoin é muito superior ao ouro, não dependemos do Estado para nada.

While the theory is interesting, I find it too speculative. The risks of centralized custody, especially in a highly regulated environment like the U.S. government, are not insignificant. Moreover, direct ownership of BTC could ultimately be the safer and more transparent option. Relying on third parties through wBTC could prove problematic, particularly when it comes to management and security.

I think it was something like that, as I mentioned in another one of your posts.

You give them too much credit, I think.

You could be right.

good theory, it could be!!!!!......but remember that WBTC is not BTC