The SEC's use of "compromised" and "unauthorized tweet" implies an internal policy or procedural violation enabled the fake tweet, not an external hack. The agency seems to have chosen its words carefully to avoid clearly stating the account was hacked. This suggests the tweet resulted from internal misuse of credentials or mishandling of account access, whether accidental or intentional. The SEC stops short of saying its systems were breached externally, keeping open the possibility of insider responsibility. Their language hints some form of internal violation of account controls led to the unauthorized tweet being posted.

#bitcoin

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1440x1003&blurhash=r36a%40t_4NH%25Nfi%25LMxMxIU%7Eqx%5Dxv%25NkCt6aeWBM%7B00RjxvogtRWCt7oMoeD%24slM_IUWXWXWCWCt7oIITITM_IURjazt7t84n9FMxM_V%3FWAoet7tR&x=e2ba3063d1c983b22f8a933b216a2ca406fe8e9b0a7b8d0e0ac3e66c1568ebd8